嗣子
1.As one might very well suppose, the four allegorical personages were somewhat fatigued after having travelled over three parts of the globe without finding an opportunity of disposing suitably of their golden dolphin.
2.It would also have required real perverseness not to have understood from the poetic imagery of the prologue that Labour was espoused to Commerce, and Clergy to Nobility, and that the two happy couples possessed between them a magnificent golden dolphin (dauphin) which they proposed to adjudge only to the most beautiful damsel.
6.It is true, that if the affection or aptness of the children be extraordinary, then it is good not to cross it;
7.His new gig turns on the disappearance of one of a pair of twins, adult scions of a rich but tragedy-prone family.
8.A man shall see,where there is a house full of children, one or two of the eldest respected, and the youngest made wantons;
9.and let them not too much apply themselves to the disposition of their children, as thinking they will take best to mat, which they have most mind to.
10.Nay more, there are some foolish rich covetous men, that take a pride, in having no children. For perhaps they have heard some talk, he hath a great charge of children; as if it were an abatement to his riches.
