平安
1.That interests me very much. I must confess that I was under the impression that W.P.A., insurance was quite sufficient and that losses due to breakage were covered. I know that F.P.A. insurance does not cover losses on consumer goods, but I did think th
很有意思.我得承认.以往我总认为投保了"水渍险"就够了,而且以为破碎引起的种种损失也包括在内.我知道"平安险"并不包括消费品的种种损失.但我确实以为"水渍险"比"平安险"承保的范围更大.
2.I see. Another thing I don't understand at this moment is the advantage of W.P.A., coverage. I thought that the W.P.A., insurance should cover all principal risks while, according to what you say, it means very little. It seems to be a phrase without muc
我懂了.另外一件事我现在还不明白的是.保"水渍险"有什么好处.我原以为"水渍险"应包括全部主要风险.而根据你所说的.它的承保责任却是很少.徒有其名.而没有本质意义.那么."水渍险"与"平安险"有什么区别呢?
