破碎
1.That interests me very much. I must confess that I was under the impression that W.P.A., insurance was quite sufficient and that losses due to breakage were covered. I know that F.P.A. insurance does not cover losses on consumer goods, but I did think th
很有意思.我得承认.以往我总认为投保了"水渍险"就够了,而且以为破碎引起的种种损失也包括在内.我知道"平安险"并不包括消费品的种种损失.但我确实以为"水渍险"比"平安险"承保的范围更大.
2.The blame does not only rest with the letter of credit. For an item like ceramics, I think the Light Industrial Products Corporation should have understood from our letter of credit that we wanted to cover all the risks, including the risk of breakage. I
问题不只是信用证.对于陶瓷器来说.我想轻工业品公司应从我们的信用证中领会到我们要保的是"一切险".包括破碎险在内.所以我得说双方都有错误.我认为损失应由双方承担.我们就对半负担吧.
