nonnuclear
2.THE COMPLICATIONS FROM atomic fallout naturally raise the question of whether any nonnuclear alternative could destroy deeply buried bunkers.
3.Nonnuclear alternatives to these technologies may well be able to achieve most, if not all, of the same ends with far less incidental risk—not just political and human, but military as well.
4.To partially compensate for less destructive power, however, engineers can design earth-penetrating technology that allows a nonnuclear warhead to dive deeper and detonate closer to its target.
