"fim"相关例句(43)
3.The relationship between FIM and BI,PULSES was significant(?P?< 0.05 ),the relationship between FIM and DRS was of no significance(?P?> 0.05 ).
4.AP-FIM Investigation of Microstructure of Precipitate Phase of A Nickel Base Superailoy
5.AP-FIM Investigation of the Initial Stage ofOxidation on the Surface of Alloys
6.Results The admission FIM scores of CBI and OBI were 81.51 and 73.09, respectively.
7.The scales of FMA and FIM were proportional to the scale of impairment in community rehabilitation.
8.The assessment of FMA FIM Pains hand dropsy skin temperature and ROM were used as the measured items.
9.The FIM efficiency was 1.6 in HMC, compared with the UDSMR 1.8 (1996) and 1.7 (1995), respectively.
10.Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at discharge and gains during rehabilitation preiod were used as the prognosis index.
11.Results The studies showed that the concentration of plasmatic glutamate was closely related to GCS and FIM (negative correlation with GCS and FIM,r 1=- 0.6566 ,P 1< 0.001 ; r 2=- 0.4839 ,P 2< 0.001 ).
12.There was a significant difference ( P <0.01) that FIM score in the GLU concentration increase group was far lower than that of the GLU concentration decrease group according to mean score of FIM after 20 days in two groups.
13.Results AROM and FIM in the patients with early rehabilitation were higher than those in the control group ( P <0.01).
14.Objective To compare the Functional Comprehensive Assessment Scale (FCA) with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and to study the validity and reliability of FCA.
15.The FIM efficiency was 1.99/day and 1.71/day for CBI and OBI. Conclusion: Both CBI and OBI patient groups showed multiple functional impairments.
16.Results 24 hours serum glutamate level was positively related with SSS(r=0.8782,P<0.001) and negatively with FIM(r=0.4859,~P<0.001 ).
17.Statistically significant correlations between contacting time and FIM scores were observed for medication management, treatment providing and teaching at admission and discharge.
18.The FIM scores and the number of patients whose whose limbs recoveried grades(>4 grades) of the Brunnstrom in group B and C were no difference( P >0 05),The FIM scores and the number of patients whose recovery grades(>4 grades) of the Brunnstrom in group A were significant higher than that in group B and C ( P <0 05).
19.Statistical techniques with univariate and multiple regression analyses indicated that significant predictors of discharge FIM scores include age, previous attacks twice or over , medical comorbidities, sensory and orientation impariments, and dementia.
