vasculogenic
1.Six vasculogenic ED patients presented normal at NEVA and 4 non-vasculogenic ED patients had abnormal NEVA.
2.Conclusions: NEVA is useful in differentiating psychological and vasculogenic ED.
3.There was no significant difference in the IIEF-5 scores either between the vasculogenic group and the non-vasculogenic one (P=0.253) or among different groups of the vasculogenic ED patients.
4.Among 58 patients who were suspicious of vasculogenic ED, 30 patients were diagnosed as having vasculogenic ED (18 arterial ED and 12 venous ED ) and the other 28 were diagnosed as having non-vasculogenic ED.
5.Results In 58 patients, there were 30 vasculogenic ED patients including 18 arterial ED, 12 venous ED and 28 non-vasculogenic ED patients.
6.Conclusion The results of NEVA can effectively help the diagnosis of vasculogenic ED.
7.Conclusion This type of ED model could be used to research the vasculogenic ED in future.
8.Conclusion NEVA is feasible and acceptable in the screening ED and diagnosis of the vasculogenic ED.
9.Effect of ets-1Antisense Oligoxydeonucleotide on Vasculogenic Mimicry in Gastric Cancer Cell Line SGC-7901 in vitro
10.The sensitivity of NEVA to diagnose vasculogenic ED is8 0%, the specificity is 85.71% and the accuracy of NEVA is 82.76%.
